RONU PATEL vs State Government — 665/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 303(2),317(2),317(4),317(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPRB010016342026

Filing Number

1530/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

665/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

1-District and Session Judge

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 23-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

28

Police Station

SALON

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 303(2),317(2),317(4),317(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RONU PATEL

    Adv. SANT SEWAK

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Government

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Summary The Session Court, Raebareli granted interim bail to three accused—Abhishek Kumar, Hariekesh, and Ronu Patel—in a theft case (Crime No. 28/2026) involving stolen engines under IPC 2023 sections 303(2), 317(2), 317(4), 317(5). The court found insufficient corroborating evidence (no independent eyewitness, no videography of recovery) and noted procedural irregularities, while approving bail on the condition of ₹50,000 personal bond each and compliance with specified court attendance obligations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Session Judge

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 665/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Session Court, Raebareli granted interim bail to three accused—Abhishek Kumar, Hariekesh, and Ronu Patel—in a theft case (Crime No. 28/2026) involving stolen engines under IPC 2023 sections 303(2), 317(2), 317(4), 317(5). The court found insufficient corroborating evidence (no independent eyewitness, no videography of recovery) and noted procedural irregularities, while approving bail on the condition of ₹50,000 personal bond each and compliance with specified court attendance obligations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case