HASNAIN vs State Government — 666/2026

Case under Arms Act Section 5/27. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPRB010016332026

Filing Number

1529/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

666/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

2-I Addl District and Session Judge

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 23-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

236

Police Station

JAIS

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Arms Act Section 5/27

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HASNAIN

    Adv. RAJESH KUMAR DUBEY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Government

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The Sessions Court, Raibareli rejected the bail application of 22-year-old Hasnain filed under the Arms Act. The court found the bail petition not maintainable because the charge sheet filed against the accused included only Section 3/25 of the Arms Act, whereas the bail application was based on Section 5/27, which was not part of the charges framed against him. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    I Addl District and Session Judge

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    I Addl District and Session Judge

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 666/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Court, Raibareli rejected the bail application of 22-year-old Hasnain filed under the Arms Act. The court found the bail petition not maintainable because the charge sheet filed against the accused included only Section 3/25 of the Arms Act, whereas the bail application was based on Section 5/27, which was not part of the charges framed against him. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case