HARIKESH vs State Government — 663/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 303(2),317(2),317(4),317(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPRB010016272026

Filing Number

1523/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

663/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

1-District and Session Judge

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 23-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

28

Police Station

SALON

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 303(2),317(2),317(4),317(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HARIKESH

    Adv. SHUBHAM SRIVASTAVA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Government

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Summary The Sessions Court at Raybareli granted interim bail to three applicants—Abhishek Kumar, Harikiesh, and Ronu Patel—in a case involving alleged theft of agricultural equipment under IPC Sections 303(2), 317(2), 317(4), and 317(5). The court found insufficient independent eyewitness evidence, no videography of the alleged seizure, and noted that co-accused had already been granted regular bail, warranting bail approval subject to personal bond of ₹50,000 each and stringent conditions including mandatory court attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Session Judge

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 663/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Sessions Court at Raybareli granted interim bail to three applicants—Abhishek Kumar, Harikiesh, and Ronu Patel—in a case involving alleged theft of agricultural equipment under IPC Sections 303(2), 317(2), 317(4), and 317(5). The court found insufficient independent eyewitness evidence, no videography of the alleged seizure, and noted that co-accused had already been granted regular bail, warranting bail approval subject to personal bond of ₹50,000 each and stringent conditions including mandatory court attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case