HADISUL NISHA URF HADIMUL NISHA vs State Government — 612/2026

Case under Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act Section 3/5/8. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 16th March 2026.

Bail Application

CNR: UPRB010015602026

Case disposed

Filing Number

1460/2026

Filing Date

09-03-2026

Registration No

612/2026

Registration Date

09-03-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

3-II- Addl. District and Session Judge

Decision Date

16th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

10

Police Station

INHAUNA

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Prevention of cruelty to Animals Act Section 3/5/8

Petitioner(s)

HADISUL NISHA URF HADIMUL NISHA

Respondent(s)

State Government

Hearing History

Judge: 3-II- Addl. District and Session Judge

16-03-2026

Disposed

11-03-2026

Hearing

09-03-2026

Hearing

Final Orders / Judgements

16-03-2026
Copy of Order

Court Decision Summary The Second Additional Sessions Judge, Raebareli, granted bail to both applicants—Aleem (32 years) and Hadisul Nisha (46 years)—in a case involving alleged cow slaughter under Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act Sections 3/5/8 and Animal Cruelty Act Section 11(1). The court found significant inconsistencies in the police investigation, including gaps between the alleged incident time (3:30 PM) and the applicants' arrest time (7:20 PM), lack of independent witnesses, and no direct recovery from the accused, leading to the conclusion that bail conditions were satisfied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Second Additional Sessions Judge, Raebareli, granted bail to both applicants—Aleem (32 years) and Hadisul Nisha (46 years)—in a case involving alleged cow slaughter under Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act Sections 3/5/8 and Animal Cruelty Act Section 11(1). The court found significant inconsistencies in the police investigation, including gaps between the alleged incident time (3:30 PM) and the applicants' arrest time (7:20 PM), lack of independent witnesses, and no direct recovery from the accused, leading to the conclusion that bail conditions were satisfied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Session Judge All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case