UMER vs State Government — 601/2026

Case under The Uttar Pradesh Govadh Nivaran Adhiniyam, 1955 Section 3,5,8. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 16th March 2026.

Bail Application

CNR: UPRB010015122026

Case disposed

Filing Number

1417/2026

Filing Date

06-03-2026

Registration No

601/2026

Registration Date

06-03-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

3-II- Addl. District and Session Judge

Decision Date

16th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

10

Police Station

INHAUNA

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

THE UTTAR PRADESH GOVADH NIVARAN ADHINIYAM, 1955 Section 3,5,8
Prevention of cruelty to Animals Act Section 11

Petitioner(s)

UMER

Adv. MAHENDRA KUMAR TIWARI

SHANA PARVEEN

Respondent(s)

State Government

Hearing History

Judge: 3-II- Addl. District and Session Judge

16-03-2026

Disposed

11-03-2026

Hearing

06-03-2026

Hearing

Final Orders / Judgements

16-03-2026
Copy of Order

Summary The court granted bail to five applicants (Umer, Sana Parveen, Mo. Shahvan Raja, Mahmood Alam, and Mo. Junaid) arrested under the Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act and animal cruelty laws. The court found significant discrepancies in the police investigation records—including timeline inconsistencies regarding arrest timing versus investigation period, lack of independent witnesses, and missing evidence documentation—which cast doubt on the prosecution's case. The applicants were released on personal bonds of Rs. 50,000 each with conditions including regular court appearance and no witness tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court granted bail to five applicants (Umer, Sana Parveen, Mo. Shahvan Raja, Mahmood Alam, and Mo. Junaid) arrested under the Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act and animal cruelty laws. The court found significant discrepancies in the police investigation records—including timeline inconsistencies regarding arrest timing versus investigation period, lack of independent witnesses, and missing evidence documentation—which cast doubt on the prosecution's case. The applicants were released on personal bonds of Rs. 50,000 each with conditions including regular court appearance and no witness tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Session Judge All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case