UMER vs State Government — 601/2026
Case under The Uttar Pradesh Govadh Nivaran Adhiniyam, 1955 Section 3,5,8. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 16th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: UPRB010015122026
Filing Number
1417/2026
Filing Date
06-Mar-2026
Registration No
601/2026
Registration Date
06-Mar-2026
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
3-II- Addl. District and Session Judge
Decision Date
16-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 23-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
10
Police Station
INHAUNA
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.UMER
Adv. MAHENDRA KUMAR TIWARI
-
2.SHANA PARVEEN
Respondent(s)
-
1.State Government
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Mar-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
Summary The court granted bail to five applicants (Umer, Sana Parveen, Mo. Shahvan Raja, Mahmood Alam, and Mo. Junaid) arrested under the Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act and animal cruelty laws. The court found significant discrepancies in the police investigation records—including timeline inconsistencies regarding arrest timing versus investigation period, lack of independent witnesses, and missing evidence documentation—which cast doubt on the prosecution's case. The applicants were released on personal bonds of Rs. 50,000 each with conditions including regular court appearance and no witness tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Mar-2026
Disposed
II- Addl. District and Session Judge
-
11-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Session Judge
-
06-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 601/2026
Summary The court granted bail to five applicants (Umer, Sana Parveen, Mo. Shahvan Raja, Mahmood Alam, and Mo. Junaid) arrested under the Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act and animal cruelty laws. The court found significant discrepancies in the police investigation records—including timeline inconsistencies regarding arrest timing versus investigation period, lack of independent witnesses, and missing evidence documentation—which cast doubt on the prosecution's case. The applicants were released on personal bonds of Rs. 50,000 each with conditions including regular court appearance and no witness tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts