ALEEM vs State Government — 576/2026
Case under The Uttar Pradesh Govadh Nivaran Adhiniyam, 1955 Section 3,5,8. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 16th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: UPRB010014302026
Filing Number
1342/2026
Filing Date
25-02-2026
Registration No
576/2026
Registration Date
25-02-2026
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
3-II- Addl. District and Session Judge
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
10
Police Station
INHAUNA
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ALEEM
Adv. MAHENDRA KUMAR TIWARI
Respondent(s)
State Government
Hearing History
Judge: 3-II- Addl. District and Session Judge
Disposed
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-03-2026 | Hearing |
| 09-03-2026 | Hearing |
| 25-02-2026 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Second Additional Sessions Judge, Raebareli granted bail to both applicants—Aleem and Hadisul Nisha—in a cow slaughter case (Crime No. 10/2026 under Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act and Animal Cruelty Act). The court found significant discrepancies in the police investigation, including inconsistencies in the timeline of arrest versus investigation start time, lack of independent witnesses to the alleged recovery, and procedural irregularities that cast doubt on the evidence reliability. The applicants were released on personal bonds of ₹50,000 each with strict conditions regarding court attendance and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Second Additional Sessions Judge, Raebareli granted bail to both applicants—Aleem and Hadisul Nisha—in a cow slaughter case (Crime No. 10/2026 under Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act and Animal Cruelty Act). The court found significant discrepancies in the police investigation, including inconsistencies in the timeline of arrest versus investigation start time, lack of independent witnesses to the alleged recovery, and procedural irregularities that cast doubt on the evidence reliability. The applicants were released on personal bonds of ₹50,000 each with strict conditions regarding court attendance and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts