LAVKUSH vs State Government — 466/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 80(2),85. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 11th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: UPRB010011822026
Filing Number
1111/2026
Filing Date
17-Feb-2026
Registration No
466/2026
Registration Date
17-Feb-2026
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
3-II- Addl. District and Session Judge
Decision Date
11-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
Last updated 23-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
317
Police Station
SHEO GARH
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.LAVKUSH
Adv. MOHD. FARJANURRAHMAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.State Government
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Mar-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
Summary The court rejected the bail application of Lavkush, accused of dowry death under IPC Sections 80(2), 85 and DP Act Sections 3/4. The court found that the prosecution's evidence—including eyewitness testimony, the postmortem report showing death by asphyxiation due to hanging, and statements from the victim's siblings—sufficiently established the accused's involvement in the serious crime of dowry-related murder, making bail inappropriate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Mar-2026
Disposed
II- Addl. District and Session Judge
-
05-Mar-2026
Hearing
II- Addl. District and Session Judge
-
26-Feb-2026
Hearing
II- Addl. District and Session Judge
-
24-Feb-2026
Hearing
II- Addl. District and Session Judge
-
17-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 466/2026
Summary The court rejected the bail application of Lavkush, accused of dowry death under IPC Sections 80(2), 85 and DP Act Sections 3/4. The court found that the prosecution's evidence—including eyewitness testimony, the postmortem report showing death by asphyxiation due to hanging, and statements from the victim's siblings—sufficiently established the accused's involvement in the serious crime of dowry-related murder, making bail inappropriate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts