RAMCHANDRA YADAV vs State Government — 421/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 103(1),238(A),61(2). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPRB010010632026

Filing Number

996/2026

Filing Date

11-Feb-2026

Registration No

421/2026

Registration Date

11-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

2-I Addl District and Session Judge

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 23-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

689

Police Station

BACHHRAWAN

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 103(1),238(A),61(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAMCHANDRA YADAV

    Adv. RAM KISHORE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Government

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Case Summary The Sessions Court, Raebareli rejected the bail application of Ramchandra Yadav (53), accused of murder under BNS sections 103(1), 238A, and 61(2) in connection with the death of Abhishek Kumar. The court found substantial circumstantial evidence linking the accused to the planned murder, including call details placing co-accused near the victim's location and testimony that the victim was last seen with them before his body was discovered with multiple fatal injuries. Bail was deemed insufficient given the serious nature of the offense and the accused's alleged role in a premeditated conspiracy. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    I Addl District and Session Judge

  4. 26-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    I Addl District and Session Judge

  5. 18-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    I Addl District and Session Judge

  6. 11-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 11-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 421/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Sessions Court, Raebareli rejected the bail application of Ramchandra Yadav (53), accused of murder under BNS sections 103(1), 238A, and 61(2) in connection with the death of Abhishek Kumar. The court found substantial circumstantial evidence linking the accused to the planned murder, including call details placing co-accused near the victim's location and testimony that the victim was last seen with them before his body was discovered with multiple fatal injuries. Bail was deemed insufficient given the serious nature of the offense and the accused's alleged role in a premeditated conspiracy. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case