ASHISH DAYAL RAI vs SMT AMRIT KAUR — 6/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 115. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 07th April 2026.

Case disposed

Civil Revision

CNR: UPRB010005032026

Filing Number

36/2026

Filing Date

21-Jan-2026

Registration No

6/2026

Registration Date

21-Jan-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

1-District and Session Judge

Decision Date

07-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 23-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 115

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ASHISH DAYAL RAI

    Adv. MUKUT BIHARI SRIVASTAVA

  2. 2.SMT VARTIKA RAI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SMT AMRIT KAUR

  2. 2.SMT LAXMI

  3. 3.GULAB SINGH

  4. 4.DIPU SINGH

  5. 5.SURENDRA JEET SINGH

  6. 6.SMT HARIVANSH KAUR ALIAS MUNNI DEVI

  7. 7.KARANJIT SINGH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Apr-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Summary The District Judge dismissed the civil revision filed by defendants Ashish Dayal Rai and Smt. Vartika Rai, confirming the lower court's rejection of their application to dismiss the plaintiffs' suit under Order VII Rule 11 CPC. The court held that since issues had already been framed on 31-01-2002 and mixed questions of law and fact were involved, the application could only be decided after evidence, and the defendants failed to demonstrate any illegality or jurisdictional error in the lower court's order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District and Session Judge

  4. 31-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    District and Session Judge

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Session Judge

  6. 21-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District and Session Judge

  7. 21-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 21-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 6/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The District Judge dismissed the civil revision filed by defendants Ashish Dayal Rai and Smt. Vartika Rai, confirming the lower court's rejection of their application to dismiss the plaintiffs' suit under Order VII Rule 11 CPC. The court held that since issues had already been framed on 31-01-2002 and mixed questions of law and fact were involved, the application could only be decided after evidence, and the defendants failed to demonstrate any illegality or jurisdictional error in the lower court's order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case