Saymin Bano vs State Government of U.P — 487/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),352,351(3),333,109(1). Disposed: Contested--DECIDED on 06th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPPG010013362026

Filing Number

1271/2026

Filing Date

18-Feb-2026

Registration No

487/2026

Registration Date

18-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

4-Addl. District Judge Court No.1

Decision Date

06-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DECIDED

Last updated 16-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),352,351(3),333,109(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Saymin Bano

    Adv. Vivek Kumar Pandey

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Government of U.P

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Copy of Bail OrderView PDF

    Case Summary The Additional District and Sessions Court in Pratapgarh granted bail to Saymeen Bano (accused) in a criminal case involving charges under BNS sections 115(2), 352, 351(3), 333, and 109(1) related to an alleged group assault on April 12, 2025. Although the prosecution opposed bail citing the serious nature of the charges (armed attack with weapons like axes and iron rods causing injuries), the court found that medical reports showed only simple injuries without significant fractures, combined with the accused's lack of prior criminal history and the disputed nature of the underlying dispute between neighbors, warranted bail. The accused was released on a personal bond of ₹50,000 with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. District Judge Court No.1

  4. 24-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Addl. District Judge Court No.1

  5. 18-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 18-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 487/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Additional District and Sessions Court in Pratapgarh granted bail to Saymeen Bano (accused) in a criminal case involving charges under BNS sections 115(2), 352, 351(3), 333, and 109(1) related to an alleged group assault on April 12, 2025. Although the prosecution opposed bail citing the serious nature of the charges (armed attack with weapons like axes and iron rods causing injuries), the court found that medical reports showed only simple injuries without significant fractures, combined with the accused's lack of prior criminal history and the disputed nature of the underlying dispute between neighbors, warranted bail. The accused was released on a personal bond of ₹50,000 with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case