Gyan Prakash Pandey urf Mahanthe vs State Government of U.P — 474/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 109(1),115(2),352,351(2). Disposed: Contested--DECIDED on 06th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPPG010013132026

Filing Number

1248/2026

Filing Date

17-Feb-2026

Registration No

474/2026

Registration Date

17-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

2-District Judge

Decision Date

06-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DECIDED

Last updated 16-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 109(1),115(2),352,351(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Gyan Prakash Pandey urf Mahanthe

    Adv. Satish Chandra Sharma

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Government of U.P

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Copy of Bail OrderView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Sessions Court at Pratapgarh granted bail to Gyan Prakash Pandey in a second bail application (Case No. 23/2026) involving charges under IPC sections 109(1), 115(2), 352, and 351(2). The court found sufficient grounds for bail considering the nature of allegations, available evidence, the accused's custody since 30.01.2026, lack of criminal history, and discrepancies in the FIR regarding the number of weapons and the victim's condition. The accused was ordered released on personal bond of ₹50,000 with one surety of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 24-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District Judge

  5. 17-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 17-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 474/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Sessions Court at Pratapgarh granted bail to Gyan Prakash Pandey in a second bail application (Case No. 23/2026) involving charges under IPC sections 109(1), 115(2), 352, and 351(2). The court found sufficient grounds for bail considering the nature of allegations, available evidence, the accused's custody since 30.01.2026, lack of criminal history, and discrepancies in the FIR regarding the number of weapons and the victim's condition. The accused was ordered released on personal bond of ₹50,000 with one surety of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case