State of UP vs Rajeev Advocate - Ashwani Kumar Singh — 371/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 109(1), 351(3), 352. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPPB010011742026

Filing Number

1105/2026

Filing Date

07-Mar-2026

Registration No

371/2026

Registration Date

07-Mar-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge Pilibhit

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 04-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

79

Police Station

BISALPUR

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 109(1), 351(3), 352
Arms Act Section 3/25/27

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of UP

    Adv. D.G.C. Criminal

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Rajeev Advocate - Ashwani Kumar Singh

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    Copy of Bail OrderView PDF

    Summary The Court of Sessions Judge, Pilibhit granted bail to accused Rajiv Singh in a case involving alleged illegal firearm possession and attempted murder. The court found that despite the serious charges under BNS sections 109(1), 351(3), 352 and Arms Act, no firearm injury evidence was available on record and the accused had already been incarcerated since February 23, 2026. The court released him on bail of Rs. 75,000 personal bond plus two sureties, subject to conditions that he not tamper with witnesses and appear on important trial dates. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Sessions Judge Pilibhit

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge Pilibhit

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 07-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 371/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Court of Sessions Judge, Pilibhit granted bail to accused Rajiv Singh in a case involving alleged illegal firearm possession and attempted murder. The court found that despite the serious charges under BNS sections 109(1), 351(3), 352 and Arms Act, no firearm injury evidence was available on record and the accused had already been incarcerated since February 23, 2026. The court released him on bail of Rs. 75,000 personal bond plus two sureties, subject to conditions that he not tamper with witnesses and appear on important trial dates. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case