State of UP vs Akram Advocate - NISHANT PANDEY — 337/2026
Case under Uttar Pradesh Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act, 1955 Section 3/5/8. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 09th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: UPPB010010012026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
940/2026
Filing Date
25-02-2026
Registration No
337/2026
Registration Date
25-02-2026
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
2-Addl. District and Sessions Judge Court No. 1. Pilibhit
Decision Date
09th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
51
Police Station
PURANPUR
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of UP
Adv. D.G.C. Criminal
Respondent(s)
Akram Advocate - NISHANT PANDEY
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Addl. District and Sessions Judge Court No. 1. Pilibhit
Disposed
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 07-03-2026 | Hearing | |
| 05-03-2026 | Hearing | |
| 26-02-2026 | Hearing | |
| 25-02-2026 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court granted bail to the accused Akram (charged under Section 5/8 of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act) on the grounds that no physical evidence or recovery was made from him, and his name appeared in the FIR only based on a police custody confession, which is inadmissible as evidence. The bail was approved with a bond of ₹50,000 and two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court granted bail to the accused Akram (charged under Section 5/8 of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act) on the grounds that no physical evidence or recovery was made from him, and his name appeared in the FIR only based on a police custody confession, which is inadmissible as evidence. The bail was approved with a bond of ₹50,000 and two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts