State of UP vs Kamil urf Muradi Advocate - NISHANT PANDEY — 338/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 109. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 09th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: UPPB010009982026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
938/2026
Filing Date
25-02-2026
Registration No
338/2026
Registration Date
25-02-2026
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
2-Addl. District and Sessions Judge Court No. 1. Pilibhit
Decision Date
09th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
56
Police Station
PURANPUR
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of UP
Adv. D.G.C. Criminal
Respondent(s)
Kamil urf Muradi Advocate - NISHANT PANDEY
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Addl. District and Sessions Judge Court No. 1. Pilibhit
Disposed
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 07-03-2026 | Hearing | |
| 05-03-2026 | Hearing | |
| 26-02-2026 | Hearing | |
| 25-02-2026 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court approved bail for accused Kamil Urf Muradi under sections 109 IPC and 3/25/27 Arms Act, setting bail at Rs. 50,000 with two sureties, finding that the FIR allegations lacked credible independent witness testimony and that no police personnel were injured in the alleged incident. The court determined that while serious charges were leveled, the case merits bail consideration given the evidentiary gaps and absence of corroborating evidence of the claimed gunfire exchange. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court approved bail for accused Kamil Urf Muradi under sections 109 IPC and 3/25/27 Arms Act, setting bail at Rs. 50,000 with two sureties, finding that the FIR allegations lacked credible independent witness testimony and that no police personnel were injured in the alleged incident. The court determined that while serious charges were leveled, the case merits bail consideration given the evidentiary gaps and absence of corroborating evidence of the claimed gunfire exchange. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts