Sonu vs State of U.P — 1114/2026

Case under Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act Section 3,4. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 07th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPMZ010027062026

Filing Number

2587/2026

Filing Date

23-Feb-2026

Registration No

1114/2026

Registration Date

23-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

1-District And Session Judge

Decision Date

07-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 03-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

302

Police Station

TITAVI

Year

2013

Acts & Sections

Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act Section 3,4

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sonu

    Adv. Chhavi Rani

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of U.P

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    Copy of Bail orderView PDF

    The court granted bail to the accused Sonu Urf Sohanveer in a case under Section 302 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Public Property (Protection against Damage) Act, 2013 for alleged unauthorized occupation of pond land. The court found that while the accused was charged with constructing unauthorized structures on government pond land, there was insufficient evidence of fire or explosives causing property damage, no prior criminal history, and the accused had been in custody since February 23, 2026. Bail was approved on two sureties of Rs. 25,000 each with standard conditions including cooperation in trial proceedings and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District And Session Judge

  4. 23-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1114/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted bail to the accused Sonu Urf Sohanveer in a case under Section 302 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Public Property (Protection against Damage) Act, 2013 for alleged unauthorized occupation of pond land. The court found that while the accused was charged with constructing unauthorized structures on government pond land, there was insufficient evidence of fire or explosives causing property damage, no prior criminal history, and the accused had been in custody since February 23, 2026. Bail was approved on two sureties of Rs. 25,000 each with standard conditions including cooperation in trial proceedings and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case