Lalit chaturvedi vs Vinod chaturvedi AND OTHERS — 410/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 24. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 03rd April 2026.
Misc. Civil Cases
CNR: UPMT010119442025
Filing Number
2125/2025
Filing Date
02-Dec-2025
Registration No
410/2025
Registration Date
02-Dec-2025
Court
District and Session Judge, Mathura
Judge
1-District & Session Judge
Decision Date
03-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 17-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Lalit chaturvedi
Respondent(s)
-
1.Vinod chaturvedi AND OTHERS
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
03-Apr-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
Summary The District Judge of Mathura granted the petitioner's transfer petition, transferring the civil suit (No. 03/2016 - Santoshi Lal v. Sumit Chaturvedi) from the 7th Additional District Judge Court to the 3rd Additional District Judge Court. The court found that the petitioner had reasonable grounds to doubt the impartiality of the original court, based on allegations of bias and procedural irregularities, including the petitioner being wrongly marked absent despite his counsel's endorsement on a counter-petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
03-Apr-2026
Disposed
District & Session Judge
-
02-Apr-2026
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
24-Mar-2026
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
16-Feb-2026
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
09-Feb-2026
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
19-Jan-2026
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
01-Jan-2026
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
18-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 410/2025
Summary The District Judge of Mathura granted the petitioner's transfer petition, transferring the civil suit (No. 03/2016 - Santoshi Lal v. Sumit Chaturvedi) from the 7th Additional District Judge Court to the 3rd Additional District Judge Court. The court found that the petitioner had reasonable grounds to doubt the impartiality of the original court, based on allegations of bias and procedural irregularities, including the petitioner being wrongly marked absent despite his counsel's endorsement on a counter-petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts