varsha vs State Government — 568/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 498a,323,504. Disposed: Contested--DECIDED on 27th April 2026.
Criminal Revision
CNR: UPMT010105952025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
9571/2025
Filing Date
18-10-2025
Registration No
568/2025
Registration Date
29-10-2025
Court
District and Session Judge, Mathura
Judge
7-Addl. District Judge Court No. 6
Decision Date
27th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DECIDED
FIR Details
FIR Number
1291
Police Station
VRINDAVAN
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
varsha
Respondent(s)
State Government
Hearing History
Judge: 7-Addl. District Judge Court No. 6
Restored
Hearing
Disposed
Disposed
Hearing
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 27-04-2026 | Restored | |
| 27-04-2026 | Hearing | |
| 27-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 24-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-04-2026 | Hearing |
Interim Orders
Summary The court dismissed the criminal revision petition filed by Mrs. Varsha against the trial court's order dated 23.07.2025, which had summoned the accused (her husband Sonu and father-in-law Chandrapal) under sections 498-A, 323, 504 IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act for alleged dowry-related harassment and cruelty. The appellate court held that the trial court's order was legally sound and based on sufficient prima facie evidence from the complainant's statement and witness testimonies, confirming that the summons were appropriately issued and no interference was warranted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court dismissed the criminal revision petition filed by Mrs. Varsha against the trial court's order dated 23.07.2025, which had summoned the accused (her husband Sonu and father-in-law Chandrapal) under sections 498-A, 323, 504 IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act for alleged dowry-related harassment and cruelty. The appellate court held that the trial court's order was legally sound and based on sufficient prima facie evidence from the complainant's statement and witness testimonies, confirming that the summons were appropriately issued and no interference was warranted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts