state goverment vs rajendra — 1736/2021
Case under I.p.c(police) Section 307,384,386,323,504,506 ipc. Disposed: Contested--CONVICTED on 26th March 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: UPMT010093902021
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
8450/2021
Filing Date
18-12-2021
Registration No
1736/2021
Registration Date
18-12-2021
Court
District and Session Judge, Mathura
Judge
1-District & Session Judge
Decision Date
26th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--CONVICTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
296
Police Station
NARHAULI Highway
Year
2019
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
state goverment
Adv. apo
Respondent(s)
rajendra
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District & Session Judge
Disposed
Judgement
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 26-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 24-03-2026 | Judgement | |
| 23-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 20-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 19-03-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Mathura Sessions Court convicted defendant Rajendra (age 33) under IPC Sections 323, 504, and 506 for causing hurt, criminal intimidation, and abusive language against complainant Yatendra Kumar on April 12, 2019. However, the court acquitted him of charges under Sections 307, 384, and 386 (attempted murder, extortion, and dacoity) due to insufficient evidence, particularly the lack of any firearm recovery or ballistic evidence. The defendant was sentenced to probation under the Probation of Offenders Act 1958 for two years with a personal bond of one lakh rupees. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Mathura Sessions Court convicted defendant Rajendra (age 33) under IPC Sections 323, 504, and 506 for causing hurt, criminal intimidation, and abusive language against complainant Yatendra Kumar on April 12, 2019. However, the court acquitted him of charges under Sections 307, 384, and 386 (attempted murder, extortion, and dacoity) due to insufficient evidence, particularly the lack of any firearm recovery or ballistic evidence. The defendant was sentenced to probation under the Probation of Offenders Act 1958 for two years with a personal bond of one lakh rupees. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts