gaurav goyal vs State Government — 660/2024

Summary The Mathura Sessions Court accepted a criminal revision petition and set aside the lower court's order charging Gaurav Goyal under Section 406 IPC (criminal breach of trust) for an alleged ice cream franchise dispute. The court found that the parties had settled their dispute, with Goyal receiving ₹2,30,000 as compensation from the complainant, and held that the underlying transaction was contractual/civil in nature, not criminal. The court allowed the compounding of the offense under Section 320 CrPC and quashed the proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.