State Government vs Vijendra and others — 236/2019
Case under I.p.c(police) Section 302,201,320B/34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 10th March 2026.
Session Trial
CNR: UPMT010058132019
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
4419/2019
Filing Date
23-04-2019
Registration No
236/2019
Registration Date
23-04-2019
Court
District and Session Judge, Mathura
Judge
7-Addl. District Judge Court No. 6
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
180
Police Station
Mahavan
Year
2012
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Government
Respondent(s)
Vijendra and others
Hearing History
Judge: 7-Addl. District Judge Court No. 6
Disposed
Prosecution Evidence
Prosecution Evidence
Prosecution Evidence
Prosecution Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 19-02-2026 | Prosecution Evidence | |
| 16-02-2026 | Prosecution Evidence | |
| 04-02-2026 | Prosecution Evidence | |
| 08-01-2026 | Prosecution Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary State v. Vivajo (Vivjendra) and Radhe | Session Trial No. 236/2019, Mathura Court's Decision: The Additional Sessions Judge acquitted both accused (Vivajo alias Vivjendra and Radhe) of charges under IPC Sections 302 (murder), 201 (causing disappearance of evidence), 120B (criminal conspiracy), and 34 (common intention). The court held that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: The victim (a watchman named Vasi/Vasudev) was found strangled on July 23, 2012. While the FIR was registered against unknown persons, the investigation later named the two accused. However, the court found that the prosecution's witnesses—including the victim's son (PW1)—explicitly denied during cross-examination that the accused committed the murder. The court noted the absence of direct eyewitness evidence, lack of motive, and failure to establish circumstantial evidence meeting the five-pronged test established in *Sharadachandra v. Maharashtra*. The accused were granted the benefit of doubt and acquitted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary State v. Vivajo (Vivjendra) and Radhe | Session Trial No. 236/2019, Mathura Court's Decision: The Additional Sessions Judge acquitted both accused (Vivajo alias Vivjendra and Radhe) of charges under IPC Sections 302 (murder), 201 (causing disappearance of evidence), 120B (criminal conspiracy), and 34 (common intention). The court held that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: The victim (a watchman named Vasi/Vasudev) was found strangled on July 23, 2012. While the FIR was registered against unknown persons, the investigation later named the two accused. However, the court found that the prosecution's witnesses—including the victim's son (PW1)—explicitly denied during cross-examination that the accused committed the murder. The court noted the absence of direct eyewitness evidence, lack of motive, and failure to establish circumstantial evidence meeting the five-pronged test established in *Sharadachandra v. Maharashtra*. The accused were granted the benefit of doubt and acquitted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts