Karan Singh Varun vs U.P.state through D.M.Mathura — 22/2020
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 115. Disposed: Contested--DECIDED on 12th March 2026.
Motor Accident Claim Petition
CNR: UPMT010057152020
Filing Number
980/2020
Filing Date
02-09-2020
Registration No
22/2020
Registration Date
07-11-2020
Court
District and Session Judge, Mathura
Judge
7-Addl. District Judge Court No. 6
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DECIDED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Karan Singh Varun
Adv. Anil Kumar Kulshreshtha
Respondent(s)
U.P.state through D.M.Mathura
Hearing History
Judge: 7-Addl. District Judge Court No. 6
Disposed
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-03-2026 | Hearing |
| 10-03-2026 | Hearing |
| 26-02-2026 | Hearing |
| 13-02-2026 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Additional District Judge of Mathura upheld the trial court's decision dismissing the plaintiff's eviction suit, finding that the property valuation was significantly underestimated at ₹12,000 based on a 1989 deed, when the suit was filed in 2015 after substantial property value appreciation. The court rejected the revision petition, holding that the trial court properly directed the plaintiff to obtain current market valuation through proper procedures and pay appropriate court fees accordingly, with no legal or evidentiary error in the original order dated 17.10.2017. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary The Additional District Judge of Mathura upheld the trial court's decision dismissing the plaintiff's eviction suit, finding that the property valuation was significantly underestimated at ₹12,000 based on a 1989 deed, when the suit was filed in 2015 after substantial property value appreciation. The court rejected the revision petition, holding that the trial court properly directed the plaintiff to obtain current market valuation through proper procedures and pay appropriate court fees accordingly, with no legal or evidentiary error in the original order dated 17.10.2017. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts