Vishnu Babra vs mohini sharan — 45/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 115. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 01st April 2026.
Civil Revision
CNR: UPMT010026912024
Filing Number
218/2024
Filing Date
14-Mar-2024
Registration No
45/2024
Registration Date
09-Apr-2024
Court
District and Session Judge, Mathura
Judge
1-District & Session Judge
Decision Date
01-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 17-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Vishnu Babra
Adv. k.k. arora
Respondent(s)
-
1.mohini sharan
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
01-Apr-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Court Decision Summary The District Judge of Mathura accepted the revision petition and set aside the lower court's order of 27.02.2024, directing the trial court to reconsider whether Vishnu Babra (the third party/monitor) should be made a necessary party to the suit. The court found that based on a will dated 03.12.2021, in which the deceased Rasika Baba appointed Vishnu Babra as his successor and heir to contested properties, the third party has a direct legal interest in the dispute and must be heard in the case for its just disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-Apr-2026
Disposed
District & Session Judge
-
30-Mar-2026
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
27-Mar-2026
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
23-Mar-2026
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
18-Mar-2026
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
13-Mar-2026
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
25-Feb-2026
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
20-Feb-2026
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
18-Feb-2026
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
13-Feb-2026
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
07-Feb-2026
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
06-Feb-2026
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
30-Jan-2026
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
20-Jan-2026
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
05-Jan-2026
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
24-Dec-2025
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
18-Dec-2025
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
09-Dec-2025
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
28-Nov-2025
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
17-Nov-2025
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
04-Nov-2025
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
16-Oct-2025
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
17-Sep-2025
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
29-Aug-2025
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
05-Aug-2025
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
11-Jul-2025
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
20-May-2025
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
06-May-2025
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
23-Apr-2025
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
11-Apr-2025
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
27-Mar-2025
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
11-Mar-2025
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
27-Feb-2025
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
13-Feb-2025
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
29-Jan-2025
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
08-Jan-2025
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
05-Dec-2024
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
21-Nov-2024
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
11-Nov-2024
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
25-Oct-2024
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
11-Oct-2024
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
17-Sep-2024
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
04-Sep-2024
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
29-Aug-2024
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
08-Aug-2024
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
05-Jul-2024
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
24-May-2024
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
03-May-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
14-Mar-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 45/2024
Court Decision Summary The District Judge of Mathura accepted the revision petition and set aside the lower court's order of 27.02.2024, directing the trial court to reconsider whether Vishnu Babra (the third party/monitor) should be made a necessary party to the suit. The court found that based on a will dated 03.12.2021, in which the deceased Rasika Baba appointed Vishnu Babra as his successor and heir to contested properties, the third party has a direct legal interest in the dispute and must be heard in the case for its just disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts