State Government vs Vikram Singh — 930/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 109(1),61(2),231,307,120b,195. Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 07th April 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPMT010020622026

Filing Number

1845/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

930/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

District and Session Judge, Mathura

Judge

1-District & Session Judge

Decision Date

07-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Rejected

Last updated 06-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

34

Police Station

RAYA

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 109(1),61(2),231,307,120b,195

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Government

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Vikram Singh

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Apr-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The Sessions Court, Mathura rejected the anticipatory bail petition of Vikram Singh in a case involving criminal conspiracy under IPC sections 109(1), 61(2), and 231. The court found that the applicant was alleged to have conspired with co-accused to frame Gulbir Singh in a false case by orchestrating a shooting incident, and insufficient grounds existed to grant bail without examining the case merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District & Session Judge

  4. 28-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District & Session Judge

  5. 27-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District & Session Judge

  6. 19-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District & Session Judge

  7. 12-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District & Session Judge

  8. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 930/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Court, Mathura rejected the anticipatory bail petition of Vikram Singh in a case involving criminal conspiracy under IPC sections 109(1), 61(2), and 231. The court found that the applicant was alleged to have conspired with co-accused to frame Gulbir Singh in a false case by orchestrating a shooting incident, and insufficient grounds existed to grant bail without examining the case merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case