State Government vs Neeraj Sharma and others — 931/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 498a,323,504,506,3,4. Disposed: Contested--DECIDED on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPMT010020572026

Filing Number

1840/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

931/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

District and Session Judge, Mathura

Judge

2-Addl. District Judge Court No. 1

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DECIDED

Last updated 06-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

189

Police Station

MANTH

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 498a,323,504,506,3,4

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Government

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Neeraj Sharma and others

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Summary: The Additional Sessions Judge at Mathura Court granted anticipatory bail to the accused (Neeraj Sharma, Chand Sharma, and Radha Devi) in a dowry harassment case under IPC Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506. The court found the case to be a family matter and decided that bail was appropriate, noting that the charge sheet had already been filed and the matter was triable by a Magistrate Court. Each accused was granted bail on furnishing a personal bond of ₹1,00,000 with two sureties of equal amount, subject to conditions including cooperation with police investigation and regular court attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. District Judge Court No. 1

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Addl. District Judge Court No. 1

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 931/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Additional Sessions Judge at Mathura Court granted anticipatory bail to the accused (Neeraj Sharma, Chand Sharma, and Radha Devi) in a dowry harassment case under IPC Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506. The court found the case to be a family matter and decided that bail was appropriate, noting that the charge sheet had already been filed and the matter was triable by a Magistrate Court. Each accused was granted bail on furnishing a personal bond of ₹1,00,000 with two sureties of equal amount, subject to conditions including cooperation with police investigation and regular court attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case