State Government vs Sunder — 925/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(2),191(3),190,115(2),118(1),117(2),110,352,351(3),. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 17th April 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: UPMT010020312026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1820/2026
Filing Date
10-03-2026
Registration No
925/2026
Registration Date
10-03-2026
Court
District and Session Judge, Mathura
Judge
1-District & Session Judge
Decision Date
17th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
FIR Details
FIR Number
302
Police Station
BARSANA
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Government
Respondent(s)
Sunder
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District & Session Judge
Disposed
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 17-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 07-04-2026 | Hearing | |
| 30-03-2026 | Hearing | |
| 19-03-2026 | Hearing | |
| 10-03-2026 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Sessions Court in Mathura granted anticipatory bail to the accused Sundar in a case involving charges under BNS sections related to rioting, criminal intimidation, and voluntarily causing hurt. The court found merit in the defense arguments highlighting inconsistencies in the prosecution's case, including lack of independent witnesses, minor medical injuries contradicting serious assault allegations, and the accused's clean criminal record, thereby ordering bail on conditions including cooperation with trial, non-interference with witnesses, and furnishing two sureties of ₹1,00,000 each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Sessions Court in Mathura granted anticipatory bail to the accused Sundar in a case involving charges under BNS sections related to rioting, criminal intimidation, and voluntarily causing hurt. The court found merit in the defense arguments highlighting inconsistencies in the prosecution's case, including lack of independent witnesses, minor medical injuries contradicting serious assault allegations, and the accused's clean criminal record, thereby ordering bail on conditions including cooperation with trial, non-interference with witnesses, and furnishing two sureties of ₹1,00,000 each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts