State Government vs Sunder — 925/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(2),191(3),190,115(2),118(1),117(2),110,352,351(3). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 17th April 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: UPMT010020312026
Filing Number
1820/2026
Filing Date
10-Mar-2026
Registration No
925/2026
Registration Date
10-Mar-2026
Court
District and Session Judge, Mathura
Judge
1-District & Session Judge
Decision Date
17-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 06-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
302
Police Station
BARSANA
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State Government
Respondent(s)
-
1.Sunder
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Apr-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
The Sessions Court in Mathura granted anticipatory bail to the accused Sundar in a case involving charges under BNS sections related to rioting, criminal intimidation, and voluntarily causing hurt. The court found merit in the defense arguments highlighting inconsistencies in the prosecution's case, including lack of independent witnesses, minor medical injuries contradicting serious assault allegations, and the accused's clean criminal record, thereby ordering bail on conditions including cooperation with trial, non-interference with witnesses, and furnishing two sureties of ₹1,00,000 each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Apr-2026
Disposed
District & Session Judge
-
07-Apr-2026
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
30-Mar-2026
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
19-Mar-2026
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
10-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 925/2026
The Sessions Court in Mathura granted anticipatory bail to the accused Sundar in a case involving charges under BNS sections related to rioting, criminal intimidation, and voluntarily causing hurt. The court found merit in the defense arguments highlighting inconsistencies in the prosecution's case, including lack of independent witnesses, minor medical injuries contradicting serious assault allegations, and the accused's clean criminal record, thereby ordering bail on conditions including cooperation with trial, non-interference with witnesses, and furnishing two sureties of ₹1,00,000 each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts