State Government vs Gaurav Sharma — 922/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(2),191(3),109,352,351(3),324(4),117(2),131,61(2). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPMT010020282026

Filing Number

1818/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

922/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

District and Session Judge, Mathura

Judge

1-District & Session Judge

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 06-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

618

Police Station

GOVARDHAN

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(2),191(3),109,352,351(3),324(4),117(2),131,61(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Government

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Gaurav Sharma

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Sessions Court in Mathura granted conditional bail to Gaurish Sharma in a case involving charges under IPC sections 191(2), 191(3), 352, 351(3), 324(4), 117(2), 131, 61(2), and 109. The court found that while the victim sustained serious injuries including fractures, the applicant had been in jail since March 8, 2026, and a co-accused had already been granted bail. The court imposed bail conditions including a personal bond of ₹1,00,000 with two sureties of equal amount, along with requirements to appear in court, refrain from similar offenses, and not intimidate prosecution witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District & Session Judge

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District & Session Judge

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 922/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Sessions Court in Mathura granted conditional bail to Gaurish Sharma in a case involving charges under IPC sections 191(2), 191(3), 352, 351(3), 324(4), 117(2), 131, 61(2), and 109. The court found that while the victim sustained serious injuries including fractures, the applicant had been in jail since March 8, 2026, and a co-accused had already been granted bail. The court imposed bail conditions including a personal bond of ₹1,00,000 with two sureties of equal amount, along with requirements to appear in court, refrain from similar offenses, and not intimidate prosecution witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case