State Government vs Gaurav Sharma — 922/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(2),191(3),109,352,351(3),324(4),117(2),131,61(2),. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 24th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: UPMT010020282026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1818/2026
Filing Date
10-03-2026
Registration No
922/2026
Registration Date
10-03-2026
Court
District and Session Judge, Mathura
Judge
1-District & Session Judge
Decision Date
24th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
FIR Details
FIR Number
618
Police Station
GOVARDHAN
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Government
Respondent(s)
Gaurav Sharma
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District & Session Judge
Disposed
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 24-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 18-03-2026 | Hearing | |
| 10-03-2026 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Sessions Court in Mathura granted conditional bail to Gaurish Sharma in a case involving charges under IPC sections 191(2), 191(3), 352, 351(3), 324(4), 117(2), 131, 61(2), and 109. The court found that while the victim sustained serious injuries including fractures, the applicant had been in jail since March 8, 2026, and a co-accused had already been granted bail. The court imposed bail conditions including a personal bond of ₹1,00,000 with two sureties of equal amount, along with requirements to appear in court, refrain from similar offenses, and not intimidate prosecution witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Sessions Court in Mathura granted conditional bail to Gaurish Sharma in a case involving charges under IPC sections 191(2), 191(3), 352, 351(3), 324(4), 117(2), 131, 61(2), and 109. The court found that while the victim sustained serious injuries including fractures, the applicant had been in jail since March 8, 2026, and a co-accused had already been granted bail. The court imposed bail conditions including a personal bond of ₹1,00,000 with two sureties of equal amount, along with requirements to appear in court, refrain from similar offenses, and not intimidate prosecution witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts