State Government vs Vikash Kumar Pandey — 921/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 420,406,467,468,471. Disposed: Contested--DECIDED on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPMT010019412026

Filing Number

1733/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

921/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

District and Session Judge, Mathura

Judge

4-Addl. District Judge Court No. 3

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DECIDED

Last updated 17-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

5

Police Station

REFINERY

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 420,406,467,468,471

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Government

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Vikash Kumar Pandey

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Case Summary The Additional Sessions Court, Mathura rejected the anticipatory bail application of Vikas Kumar Pandey, accused of criminal conspiracy, cheating, and forgery (IPC Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471) for allegedly defrauding multiple victims by promising fake jobs. The court found sufficient prima facie evidence of a serious financial crime against society and noted that a co-accused's similar bail plea was previously rejected, providing no justifiable grounds to grant anticipatory bail to the applicant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. District Judge Court No. 3

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 921/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Additional Sessions Court, Mathura rejected the anticipatory bail application of Vikas Kumar Pandey, accused of criminal conspiracy, cheating, and forgery (IPC Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471) for allegedly defrauding multiple victims by promising fake jobs. The court found sufficient prima facie evidence of a serious financial crime against society and noted that a co-accused's similar bail plea was previously rejected, providing no justifiable grounds to grant anticipatory bail to the applicant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case