State Government vs tej singh — 891/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 303(2),317(2). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPMT010018472026

Filing Number

1650/2026

Filing Date

27-Feb-2026

Registration No

891/2026

Registration Date

27-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Judge, Mathura

Judge

2-Addl. District Judge Court No. 1

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 06-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

57

Police Station

FARAH

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 303(2),317(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Government

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.tej singh

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The Additional Sessions Judge of Mathura Court granted bail to accused Tej Singh in a motorcycle theft case (Crime No. 57/2026) under sections 303(2) and 317(2) BNS, finding sufficient grounds for release on bail despite prosecution opposition. The accused was ordered released on personal bond of ₹1,00,000 with two sureties of equal amount, subject to conditions including regular court appearance, non-interference with witnesses, and cooperation in investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. District Judge Court No. 1

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Addl. District Judge Court No. 1

  5. 27-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 27-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 891/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional Sessions Judge of Mathura Court granted bail to accused Tej Singh in a motorcycle theft case (Crime No. 57/2026) under sections 303(2) and 317(2) BNS, finding sufficient grounds for release on bail despite prosecution opposition. The accused was ordered released on personal bond of ₹1,00,000 with two sureties of equal amount, subject to conditions including regular court appearance, non-interference with witnesses, and cooperation in investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case