State Government vs aniruddhacahrya — 887/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 420,467,468,471. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPMT010018462026

Filing Number

1649/2026

Filing Date

27-Feb-2026

Registration No

887/2026

Registration Date

27-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Judge, Mathura

Judge

1-District & Session Judge

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 17-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

51

Police Station

VRINDAVAN

Year

2000

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 420,467,468,471

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Government

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.aniruddhacahrya

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Case Summary The Sessions Court, Mathura granted conditional bail to accused Aniruddhacharya in Criminal Case No. 51/2000 under IPC Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 (forgery and cheating). The accused was charged with conspiracy to seize complainant's valuable 6-acre property by creating forged documents, including a fake will (1986) and fraudulent death certificate (2000). The court found the accused had been in judicial custody since 26.02.2026, had no prior criminal history, and co-accused were already granted bail, warranting conditional bail with personal bond of ₹1,00,000 and two sureties, subject to court attendance and non-interference with prosecution evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District & Session Judge

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District & Session Judge

  5. 27-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 27-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 887/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Sessions Court, Mathura granted conditional bail to accused Aniruddhacharya in Criminal Case No. 51/2000 under IPC Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 (forgery and cheating). The accused was charged with conspiracy to seize complainant's valuable 6-acre property by creating forged documents, including a fake will (1986) and fraudulent death certificate (2000). The court found the accused had been in judicial custody since 26.02.2026, had no prior criminal history, and co-accused were already granted bail, warranting conditional bail with personal bond of ₹1,00,000 and two sureties, subject to court attendance and non-interference with prosecution evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case