State Government vs ROHIT ALIAS ROHITASH — 870/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 309(4),317(2). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPMT010018302026

Filing Number

1635/2026

Filing Date

26-Feb-2026

Registration No

870/2026

Registration Date

26-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Judge, Mathura

Judge

2-Addl. District Judge Court No. 1

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 06-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

16

Police Station

Mahavan

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 309(4),317(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Government

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ROHIT ALIAS ROHITASH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The Additional Sessions Judge, Mathura granted bail to the accused in a case involving alleged snatching of a mobile phone and purse from a moving e-rickshaw, causing injury to the victim. The court found sufficient grounds for bail considering the lack of independent eyewitnesses, no recovery of stolen items from the accused's possession, and the fact that bail had previously been granted to co-accused in related cases, while imposing standard bail conditions including a personal bond of ₹1,00,000 and two sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. District Judge Court No. 1

  4. 26-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 26-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 870/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional Sessions Judge, Mathura granted bail to the accused in a case involving alleged snatching of a mobile phone and purse from a moving e-rickshaw, causing injury to the victim. The court found sufficient grounds for bail considering the lack of independent eyewitnesses, no recovery of stolen items from the accused's possession, and the fact that bail had previously been granted to co-accused in related cases, while imposing standard bail conditions including a personal bond of ₹1,00,000 and two sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case