State Government vs SHAILENDRA PACHAURI — 864/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 316(2),318(4),338,336(3),340(2),61(2). Disposed: Uncontested--Not Press on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPMT010018242026

Filing Number

1632/2026

Filing Date

26-Feb-2026

Registration No

864/2026

Registration Date

26-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Judge, Mathura

Judge

4-Addl. District Judge Court No. 3

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Not Press

Last updated 06-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

603

Police Station

KOTWALI

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 316(2),318(4),338,336(3),340(2),61(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Government

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHAILENDRA PACHAURI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Summary: The Additional Sessions Court, Mathura rejected the anticipatory bail petition of Shailendra Pachauri, an employee of SMFG India Home Finance Company Ltd, who was accused of conspiring with other company employees and a loan agent to defraud the company by creating fake KYC documents and forged salary slips to illegally disburse loans totaling ₹79,90,000 to four fabricated borrowers. The court found the charges serious, involving organized financial fraud against a legitimate financial institution, and determined there was no sufficient ground to grant anticipatory bail, as the applicant failed to establish any legitimate reason for being falsely implicated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. District Judge Court No. 3

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Addl. District Judge Court No. 3

  5. 26-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 26-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 864/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Additional Sessions Court, Mathura rejected the anticipatory bail petition of Shailendra Pachauri, an employee of SMFG India Home Finance Company Ltd, who was accused of conspiring with other company employees and a loan agent to defraud the company by creating fake KYC documents and forged salary slips to illegally disburse loans totaling ₹79,90,000 to four fabricated borrowers. The court found the charges serious, involving organized financial fraud against a legitimate financial institution, and determined there was no sufficient ground to grant anticipatory bail, as the applicant failed to establish any legitimate reason for being falsely implicated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case