lakshman vs State Government — 874/2026

Case under Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti-social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 Section 2,3. Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPMT010018182026

Filing Number

1627/2026

Filing Date

26-Feb-2026

Registration No

874/2026

Registration Date

26-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Judge, Mathura

Judge

6-Addl. District Judge Court No. 5

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Rejected

Last updated 17-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

94

Police Station

SHERGARH

Year

2014

Acts & Sections

Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti-social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 Section 2,3

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.lakshman

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Government

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Summary: The Special Judge (Gangster Act) at Mathura granted bail to accused Lakshman in a case under Section 2/3 of the UP Gangster Act (Crime No. 94/2014). Although the accused had previously violated bail conditions by absconding due to illness, the court accepted his bail application after considering his undertaking to appear regularly in court and cooperate fully in the trial. The court imposed a bail bond of ₹1,00,000 with one surety and directed verification of the accused's address by the concerned police station. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. District Judge Court No. 5

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 26-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 874/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Special Judge (Gangster Act) at Mathura granted bail to accused Lakshman in a case under Section 2/3 of the UP Gangster Act (Crime No. 94/2014). Although the accused had previously violated bail conditions by absconding due to illness, the court accepted his bail application after considering his undertaking to appear regularly in court and cooperate fully in the trial. The court imposed a bail bond of ₹1,00,000 with one surety and directed verification of the accused's address by the concerned police station. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case