Pushpendra vs State Government — 901/2026
Case under Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti-social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 Section 2,3. Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 19th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: UPMT010017852026
Filing Number
1596/2026
Filing Date
25-Feb-2026
Registration No
901/2026
Registration Date
27-Feb-2026
Court
District and Session Judge, Mathura
Judge
6-Addl. District Judge Court No. 5
Decision Date
19-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Rejected
Last updated 06-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
70
Police Station
NAUJHIL
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Pushpendra
Respondent(s)
-
1.State Government
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
19-Mar-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
Summary: The Special Judge (Gangster Act) at Mathura rejected the bail plea of accused Pushpendra, who is the alleged gang leader charged under the UP Gangster Act for organized crimes including rape, extortion, and intimidation. The court found that under Section 19(4-B) of the UP Gangster Act, 1986, bail can only be granted if the court is satisfied the accused is not guilty and won't commit further offenses—conditions not met here given the serious allegations and criminal gang involvement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addl. District Judge Court No. 5
-
13-Mar-2026
Hearing
Addl. District Judge Court No. 5
-
12-Mar-2026
Hearing
Addl. District Judge Court No. 5
-
10-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 901/2026
Summary: The Special Judge (Gangster Act) at Mathura rejected the bail plea of accused Pushpendra, who is the alleged gang leader charged under the UP Gangster Act for organized crimes including rape, extortion, and intimidation. The court found that under Section 19(4-B) of the UP Gangster Act, 1986, bail can only be granted if the court is satisfied the accused is not guilty and won't commit further offenses—conditions not met here given the serious allegations and criminal gang involvement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts