State Government vs SHRIMAN ALIAS GOVIND — 852/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 64(1),115(2),75,,76,352,351(3),. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 18th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: UPMT010017842026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1595/2026
Filing Date
25-02-2026
Registration No
852/2026
Registration Date
25-02-2026
Court
District and Session Judge, Mathura
Judge
1-District & Session Judge
Decision Date
18th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
FIR Details
FIR Number
11
Police Station
MANTH
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Government
Respondent(s)
SHRIMAN ALIAS GOVIND
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District & Session Judge
Disposed
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | Hearing | |
| 25-02-2026 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Sessions Court, Mathura granted conditional bail to the accused Shriman (alias Govind) in a case involving charges under IPC Sections 64(1), 115(2), 75, 76, 352, and 351(3). The court found that the prosecution's case appeared to be a case of molestation rather than rape, noting inconsistencies in the FIR, the victim's inability to identify the perpetrator due to poor eyesight, and supporting affidavits from witness women who were present at the time. The accused was ordered released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of ₹1,00,000 with two sureties of equal amount, subject to standard conditions including court appearance and non-interference with prosecution witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Sessions Court, Mathura granted conditional bail to the accused Shriman (alias Govind) in a case involving charges under IPC Sections 64(1), 115(2), 75, 76, 352, and 351(3). The court found that the prosecution's case appeared to be a case of molestation rather than rape, noting inconsistencies in the FIR, the victim's inability to identify the perpetrator due to poor eyesight, and supporting affidavits from witness women who were present at the time. The accused was ordered released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of ₹1,00,000 with two sureties of equal amount, subject to standard conditions including court appearance and non-interference with prosecution witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts