State Government vs SHRIMAN ALIAS GOVIND — 852/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 64(1),115(2),75,,76,352,351(3),. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 18th March 2026.

Bail Application

CNR: UPMT010017842026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

1595/2026

Filing Date

25-02-2026

Registration No

852/2026

Registration Date

25-02-2026

Court

District and Session Judge, Mathura

Judge

1-District & Session Judge

Decision Date

18th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

FIR Details

FIR Number

11

Police Station

MANTH

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 64(1),115(2),75,,76,352,351(3),

Petitioner(s)

State Government

Respondent(s)

SHRIMAN ALIAS GOVIND

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District & Session Judge

18-03-2026

Disposed

10-03-2026

Hearing

25-02-2026

Hearing

Final Orders / Judgements

18-03-2026
Copy of Order

Summary The Sessions Court, Mathura granted conditional bail to the accused Shriman (alias Govind) in a case involving charges under IPC Sections 64(1), 115(2), 75, 76, 352, and 351(3). The court found that the prosecution's case appeared to be a case of molestation rather than rape, noting inconsistencies in the FIR, the victim's inability to identify the perpetrator due to poor eyesight, and supporting affidavits from witness women who were present at the time. The accused was ordered released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of ₹1,00,000 with two sureties of equal amount, subject to standard conditions including court appearance and non-interference with prosecution witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Sessions Court, Mathura granted conditional bail to the accused Shriman (alias Govind) in a case involving charges under IPC Sections 64(1), 115(2), 75, 76, 352, and 351(3). The court found that the prosecution's case appeared to be a case of molestation rather than rape, noting inconsistencies in the FIR, the victim's inability to identify the perpetrator due to poor eyesight, and supporting affidavits from witness women who were present at the time. The accused was ordered released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of ₹1,00,000 with two sureties of equal amount, subject to standard conditions including court appearance and non-interference with prosecution witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Session Judge, Mathura All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case