State Government vs KISHANVIR — 847/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 309(4),317(2). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 11th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: UPMT010017812026
Filing Number
1592/2026
Filing Date
25-Feb-2026
Registration No
847/2026
Registration Date
25-Feb-2026
Court
District and Session Judge, Mathura
Judge
2-Addl. District Judge Court No. 1
Decision Date
11-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 17-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
16
Police Station
Mahavan
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State Government
Respondent(s)
-
1.KISHANVIR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Mar-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
Summary: The Additional Sessions Judge, Mathura, granted bail to accused Kishanveer in a robbery case involving a mobile phone and purse snatching from a woman traveling by e-rickshaw. The court found no independent witnesses, noted the co-accused was already granted bail, and determined that prolonged pre-trial detention would serve no purpose. Kishanveer was released on a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000 with two sureties of equal amount, subject to conditions including court appearance, non-tampering with evidence, and non-intimidation of witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addl. District Judge Court No. 1
-
09-Mar-2026
Hearing
Addl. District Judge Court No. 1
-
06-Mar-2026
Hearing
Addl. District Judge Court No. 1
-
25-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 847/2026
Summary: The Additional Sessions Judge, Mathura, granted bail to accused Kishanveer in a robbery case involving a mobile phone and purse snatching from a woman traveling by e-rickshaw. The court found no independent witnesses, noted the co-accused was already granted bail, and determined that prolonged pre-trial detention would serve no purpose. Kishanveer was released on a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000 with two sureties of equal amount, subject to conditions including court appearance, non-tampering with evidence, and non-intimidation of witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts