State Government vs KISHANVIR — 851/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 309(4),317(2). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPMT010017802026

Filing Number

1591/2026

Filing Date

25-Feb-2026

Registration No

851/2026

Registration Date

25-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Judge, Mathura

Judge

2-Addl. District Judge Court No. 1

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 17-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

19

Police Station

Mahavan

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 309(4),317(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Government

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KISHANVIR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The Mathura Additional Sessions Judge granted bail to accused Kishanveer in a mobile phone snatching case, finding that there was no independent witness, the co-accused had already been granted bail, and prolonged pre-trial detention would serve no purpose. The applicant was released on a personal bond of Rs. 1 lakh with two sureties of equal amount, subject to conditions including non-tampering with evidence and regular court appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. District Judge Court No. 1

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Addl. District Judge Court No. 1

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Addl. District Judge Court No. 1

  6. 25-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 25-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 851/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Mathura Additional Sessions Judge granted bail to accused Kishanveer in a mobile phone snatching case, finding that there was no independent witness, the co-accused had already been granted bail, and prolonged pre-trial detention would serve no purpose. The applicant was released on a personal bond of Rs. 1 lakh with two sureties of equal amount, subject to conditions including non-tampering with evidence and regular court appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case