State Government vs SUSHIL AND OTHERS — 849/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(2),191(3),190,109(1),115(2),125,352,351(2),7. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 25th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: UPMT010017732026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1585/2026
Filing Date
25-02-2026
Registration No
849/2026
Registration Date
25-02-2026
Court
District and Session Judge, Mathura
Judge
4-Addl. District Judge Court No. 3
Decision Date
25th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
FIR Details
FIR Number
53
Police Station
FARAH
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Government
Respondent(s)
SUSHIL AND OTHERS
Hearing History
Judge: 4-Addl. District Judge Court No. 3
Disposed
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 25-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 20-03-2026 | Hearing | |
| 13-03-2026 | Hearing | |
| 10-03-2026 | Hearing | |
| 25-02-2026 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary The Additional Sessions Court in Mathura granted conditional bail to accused Sushil and Ghanshyam in a case involving charges under BNS sections related to rioting and criminal intimidation. The court found that while a dispute between two groups at a grocery shop had escalated into a violent clash on 20.02.2026, the prosecution failed to establish any specific individual role or serious injury, and no prior criminal history existed. Each accused was released on personal bond of ₹1,00,000 with standard bail conditions including court appearance and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary The Additional Sessions Court in Mathura granted conditional bail to accused Sushil and Ghanshyam in a case involving charges under BNS sections related to rioting and criminal intimidation. The court found that while a dispute between two groups at a grocery shop had escalated into a violent clash on 20.02.2026, the prosecution failed to establish any specific individual role or serious injury, and no prior criminal history existed. Each accused was released on personal bond of ₹1,00,000 with standard bail conditions including court appearance and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts