State Government vs SUSHIL AND OTHERS — 849/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(2),191(3),190,109(1),115(2),125,352,351(2),7. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 25th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: UPMT010017732026
Filing Number
1585/2026
Filing Date
25-Feb-2026
Registration No
849/2026
Registration Date
25-Feb-2026
Court
District and Session Judge, Mathura
Judge
4-Addl. District Judge Court No. 3
Decision Date
25-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 06-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
53
Police Station
FARAH
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State Government
Respondent(s)
-
1.SUSHIL AND OTHERS
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
25-Mar-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
Case Summary The Additional Sessions Court in Mathura granted conditional bail to accused Sushil and Ghanshyam in a case involving charges under BNS sections related to rioting and criminal intimidation. The court found that while a dispute between two groups at a grocery shop had escalated into a violent clash on 20.02.2026, the prosecution failed to establish any specific individual role or serious injury, and no prior criminal history existed. Each accused was released on personal bond of ₹1,00,000 with standard bail conditions including court appearance and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addl. District Judge Court No. 3
-
20-Mar-2026
Hearing
Addl. District Judge Court No. 3
-
13-Mar-2026
Hearing
Addl. District Judge Court No. 3
-
10-Mar-2026
Hearing
Addl. District Judge Court No. 3
-
25-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 849/2026
Case Summary The Additional Sessions Court in Mathura granted conditional bail to accused Sushil and Ghanshyam in a case involving charges under BNS sections related to rioting and criminal intimidation. The court found that while a dispute between two groups at a grocery shop had escalated into a violent clash on 20.02.2026, the prosecution failed to establish any specific individual role or serious injury, and no prior criminal history existed. Each accused was released on personal bond of ₹1,00,000 with standard bail conditions including court appearance and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts