State Government vs Man singh and others — 841/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(2),191(3),190,109(1),115(2),125,352,351(2),7. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 25th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: UPMT010017552026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1569/2026
Filing Date
25-02-2026
Registration No
841/2026
Registration Date
25-02-2026
Court
District and Session Judge, Mathura
Judge
4-Addl. District Judge Court No. 3
Decision Date
25th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
FIR Details
FIR Number
53
Police Station
FARAH
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Government
Respondent(s)
Man singh and others
Hearing History
Judge: 4-Addl. District Judge Court No. 3
Disposed
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 25-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 20-03-2026 | Hearing | |
| 13-03-2026 | Hearing | |
| 10-03-2026 | Hearing | |
| 25-02-2026 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Mathura Additional Sessions Court granted bail to applicants Maan Singh and Anul Singh in a case involving charges under BNS sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 109(1), 115(2), 125, 352, 351(2) related to a communal clash over credit dispute in a grocery store. The court found that while a brawl occurred between two groups, the applicants' individual roles were unclear, they had no prior criminal history, and independent evidence was lacking—making bail justified without prejudging the merits. Each applicant was released on personal bond of ₹1,00,000 with two sureties and standard conditions requiring court appearance, non-interference with witnesses, and abstention from similar offenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Mathura Additional Sessions Court granted bail to applicants Maan Singh and Anul Singh in a case involving charges under BNS sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 109(1), 115(2), 125, 352, 351(2) related to a communal clash over credit dispute in a grocery store. The court found that while a brawl occurred between two groups, the applicants' individual roles were unclear, they had no prior criminal history, and independent evidence was lacking—making bail justified without prejudging the merits. Each applicant was released on personal bond of ₹1,00,000 with two sureties and standard conditions requiring court appearance, non-interference with witnesses, and abstention from similar offenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts