Rohatas vs State Government — 816/2026
Case under Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti-social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 Section 2,3. Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 12th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: UPMT010017442026
Filing Number
1559/2026
Filing Date
24-Feb-2026
Registration No
816/2026
Registration Date
24-Feb-2026
Court
District and Session Judge, Mathura
Judge
6-Addl. District Judge Court No. 5
Decision Date
12-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Rejected
Last updated 06-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
643
Police Station
Jait
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Rohatas
Respondent(s)
-
1.State Government
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-Mar-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
The court rejected the bail application of accused Rohtash, who is charged under the UP Gangster Act (FIR 643/2025) for allegedly being a member of an organized criminal gang engaged in armed robbery and attacks on police. The court found that the charter sheet shows a criminal history and that under Section 19(4-B) of the UP Gangster Act, bail can only be granted when the court is satisfied the accused is not guilty and will not reoffend—conditions not met here as the chargesheet has already been filed. The bail petition was dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addl. District Judge Court No. 5
-
10-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 816/2026
The court rejected the bail application of accused Rohtash, who is charged under the UP Gangster Act (FIR 643/2025) for allegedly being a member of an organized criminal gang engaged in armed robbery and attacks on police. The court found that the charter sheet shows a criminal history and that under Section 19(4-B) of the UP Gangster Act, bail can only be granted when the court is satisfied the accused is not guilty and will not reoffend—conditions not met here as the chargesheet has already been filed. The bail petition was dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts