State Government vs Amin — 815/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 305,317(2),3,5. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 12th March 2026.

Bail Application

CNR: UPMT010017072026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

1526/2026

Filing Date

24-02-2026

Registration No

815/2026

Registration Date

24-02-2026

Court

District and Session Judge, Mathura

Judge

2-Addl. District Judge Court No. 1

Decision Date

12th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

FIR Details

FIR Number

576

Police Station

CHHATA

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 305,317(2),3,5

Petitioner(s)

State Government

Adv. RAMESHWAR PRASAD SINGHAL

Respondent(s)

Amin

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Addl. District Judge Court No. 1

12-03-2026

Disposed

10-03-2026

Hearing

24-02-2026

Hearing

Final Orders / Judgements

12-03-2026
Copy of Order

Summary The Additional Sessions Court in Mathura granted bail to the accused Amin in a theft case (Crime No. 576/2025) involving alleged theft of a bag containing a tablet, bank documents, and ₹1,70,000 from a bank. The court found sufficient grounds for bail despite prosecution opposition, noting the absence of independent witnesses, no on-spot arrest, lack of CCTV evidence of the alleged theft, and the accused's detention since 16.02.2026. Bail was granted on a personal bond of ₹1,00,000 with two sureties and standard conditions including appearance at trial and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Additional Sessions Court in Mathura granted bail to the accused Amin in a theft case (Crime No. 576/2025) involving alleged theft of a bag containing a tablet, bank documents, and ₹1,70,000 from a bank. The court found sufficient grounds for bail despite prosecution opposition, noting the absence of independent witnesses, no on-spot arrest, lack of CCTV evidence of the alleged theft, and the accused's detention since 16.02.2026. Bail was granted on a personal bond of ₹1,00,000 with two sureties and standard conditions including appearance at trial and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Session Judge, Mathura All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case