State Government vs Amin — 815/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 305,317(2),3,5. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPMT010017072026

Filing Number

1526/2026

Filing Date

24-Feb-2026

Registration No

815/2026

Registration Date

24-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Judge, Mathura

Judge

2-Addl. District Judge Court No. 1

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 06-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

576

Police Station

CHHATA

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 305,317(2),3,5

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Government

    Adv. RAMESHWAR PRASAD SINGHAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Amin

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Summary The Additional Sessions Court in Mathura granted bail to the accused Amin in a theft case (Crime No. 576/2025) involving alleged theft of a bag containing a tablet, bank documents, and ₹1,70,000 from a bank. The court found sufficient grounds for bail despite prosecution opposition, noting the absence of independent witnesses, no on-spot arrest, lack of CCTV evidence of the alleged theft, and the accused's detention since 16.02.2026. Bail was granted on a personal bond of ₹1,00,000 with two sureties and standard conditions including appearance at trial and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. District Judge Court No. 1

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Addl. District Judge Court No. 1

  5. 24-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 24-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 815/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Additional Sessions Court in Mathura granted bail to the accused Amin in a theft case (Crime No. 576/2025) involving alleged theft of a bag containing a tablet, bank documents, and ₹1,70,000 from a bank. The court found sufficient grounds for bail despite prosecution opposition, noting the absence of independent witnesses, no on-spot arrest, lack of CCTV evidence of the alleged theft, and the accused's detention since 16.02.2026. Bail was granted on a personal bond of ₹1,00,000 with two sureties and standard conditions including appearance at trial and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case