State Government vs vaishnu Das alias Vishnu Das — 795/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(2),115(2),109(1),351(3),127(2),333,324(5). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPMT010016732026

Filing Number

1495/2026

Filing Date

21-Feb-2026

Registration No

795/2026

Registration Date

21-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Judge, Mathura

Judge

1-District & Session Judge

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 06-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

54

Police Station

VRINDAVAN

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(2),115(2),109(1),351(3),127(2),333,324(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Government

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.vaishnu Das alias Vishnu Das

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Sessions Court, Mathura granted conditional bail to accused Vishnu Das in a criminal case involving charges under IPC sections 191, 115, 109, 351, 127, 333, and 324. The court found that the accused was not named in the FIR, has no prior criminal history, has been in judicial custody since February 19, 2026, and that the prosecution presented no evidence of serious or fatal injuries to the complainant's witnesses. Bail was granted on the condition of executing a personal bond of ₹1,00,000 with two sureties and compliance with standard bail conditions including appearance at trial dates and non-interference with prosecution witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District & Session Judge

  4. 21-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 21-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 795/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Sessions Court, Mathura granted conditional bail to accused Vishnu Das in a criminal case involving charges under IPC sections 191, 115, 109, 351, 127, 333, and 324. The court found that the accused was not named in the FIR, has no prior criminal history, has been in judicial custody since February 19, 2026, and that the prosecution presented no evidence of serious or fatal injuries to the complainant's witnesses. Bail was granted on the condition of executing a personal bond of ₹1,00,000 with two sureties and compliance with standard bail conditions including appearance at trial dates and non-interference with prosecution witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case