Dharmendra vs State Government — 811/2026

Case under Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti-social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 Section 2,3. Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPMT010016712026

Filing Number

1493/2026

Filing Date

21-Feb-2026

Registration No

811/2026

Registration Date

24-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Judge, Mathura

Judge

6-Addl. District Judge Court No. 5

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Rejected

Last updated 17-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

115

Police Station

NARHAULI Highway

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti-social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 Section 2,3

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Dharmendra

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Government

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The court rejected the bail petition of Dharmendra, accused of being a gang leader under the U.P. Gangster Act, finding sufficient grounds to believe he is involved in organized criminal activities including vehicle theft. The court applied Section 19(4-B) of the Act, which requires satisfaction that the accused is not guilty of the alleged offense and will not commit further crimes on bail—conditions not met in this case given his criminal history and gang involvement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. District Judge Court No. 5

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Addl. District Judge Court No. 5

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 21-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 811/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court rejected the bail petition of Dharmendra, accused of being a gang leader under the U.P. Gangster Act, finding sufficient grounds to believe he is involved in organized criminal activities including vehicle theft. The court applied Section 19(4-B) of the Act, which requires satisfaction that the accused is not guilty of the alleged offense and will not commit further crimes on bail—conditions not met in this case given his criminal history and gang involvement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case