State Government vs AJEET — 798/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 309(4),352,317(2). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPMT010016522026

Filing Number

1474/2026

Filing Date

20-Feb-2026

Registration No

798/2026

Registration Date

21-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Judge, Mathura

Judge

2-Addl. District Judge Court No. 1

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 06-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

35

Police Station

BALDEO

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 309(4),352,317(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Government

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.AJEET

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The Additional Sessions Judge at Mathura Court granted bail to the accused Ajit in a robbery case (FIR No. 35/2026 under BNS sections 309(4), 317(2), and 352) on the grounds that the accused was not named in the FIR, was not arrested at the spot, lacked independent witnesses, and a co-accused had already been granted bail by the same court. The accused was released on personal bond of ₹1,00,000 with two sureties of equal amount, subject to standard bail conditions including regular court appearance and non-interference with prosecution witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. District Judge Court No. 1

  4. 21-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 20-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 798/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional Sessions Judge at Mathura Court granted bail to the accused Ajit in a robbery case (FIR No. 35/2026 under BNS sections 309(4), 317(2), and 352) on the grounds that the accused was not named in the FIR, was not arrested at the spot, lacked independent witnesses, and a co-accused had already been granted bail by the same court. The accused was released on personal bond of ₹1,00,000 with two sureties of equal amount, subject to standard bail conditions including regular court appearance and non-interference with prosecution witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case