State Government vs Vipin Singh Yadav — 777/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 420,4409,406,467,468,471. Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPMT010016482026

Filing Number

1470/2026

Filing Date

20-Feb-2026

Registration No

777/2026

Registration Date

20-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Judge, Mathura

Judge

4-Addl. District Judge Court No. 3

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Rejected

Last updated 06-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

572

Police Station

FARAH

Year

2017

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 420,4409,406,467,468,471

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Government

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Vipin Singh Yadav

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The court rejected the bail petition of accused Vipin Singh Yadav in a fraud case (FIR No. 572/2017) involving cheating under IPC sections 420, 467, 468, and 471. The court found prima facie evidence that the accused, along with co-accused directors, defrauded complainants of ₹5,32,000 by falsely promising residential flats and refusing both to deliver the property or refund the money, and noted the accused had 46 similar criminal cases on record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. District Judge Court No. 3

  4. 27-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Addl. District Judge Court No. 3

  5. 20-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 20-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 777/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court rejected the bail petition of accused Vipin Singh Yadav in a fraud case (FIR No. 572/2017) involving cheating under IPC sections 420, 467, 468, and 471. The court found prima facie evidence that the accused, along with co-accused directors, defrauded complainants of ₹5,32,000 by falsely promising residential flats and refusing both to deliver the property or refund the money, and noted the accused had 46 similar criminal cases on record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case