State Government vs Vipin Singh Yadav — 779/2026
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 420,409,406,467,468,471,. Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 10th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: UPMT010016462026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1468/2026
Filing Date
20-02-2026
Registration No
779/2026
Registration Date
20-02-2026
Court
District and Session Judge, Mathura
Judge
4-Addl. District Judge Court No. 3
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Rejected
FIR Details
FIR Number
98
Police Station
FARAH
Year
2018
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Government
Respondent(s)
Vipin Singh Yadav
Hearing History
Judge: 4-Addl. District Judge Court No. 3
Disposed
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 27-02-2026 | Hearing | |
| 20-02-2026 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Court, Mathura rejected the bail application of Vipin Singh Yadav in FIR No. 98/2018 under IPC sections 420, 406, 409, 467, 468, and 471. The accused was charged with defrauding the complainant and his wife of ₹11,00,000 by falsely selling two flats through a company without delivering the property or refunding the money. The court found sufficient prima facie evidence of serious offenses including criminal breach of trust and forgery, noting the accused's criminal history of 46 similar cases, and determined bail was not warranted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Court, Mathura rejected the bail application of Vipin Singh Yadav in FIR No. 98/2018 under IPC sections 420, 406, 409, 467, 468, and 471. The accused was charged with defrauding the complainant and his wife of ₹11,00,000 by falsely selling two flats through a company without delivering the property or refunding the money. The court found sufficient prima facie evidence of serious offenses including criminal breach of trust and forgery, noting the accused's criminal history of 46 similar cases, and determined bail was not warranted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts