State Government vs Vipin Singh Yadav — 780/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 420,409,406,467,468,471. Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 10th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: UPMT010016452026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1467/2026
Filing Date
20-02-2026
Registration No
780/2026
Registration Date
20-02-2026
Court
District and Session Judge, Mathura
Judge
4-Addl. District Judge Court No. 3
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Rejected
FIR Details
FIR Number
168
Police Station
FARAH
Year
2018
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Government
Respondent(s)
Vipin Singh Yadav
Hearing History
Judge: 4-Addl. District Judge Court No. 3
Disposed
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 27-02-2026 | Hearing | |
| 20-02-2026 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary The Additional Sessions Court, Mathura rejected the bail application of Vipin Singh Yadav in a fraud case (Crime No. 168/2018) involving charges under IPC sections 420, 406, 409, 467, 468, and 471. The court found prima facie evidence that the accused, along with co-conspirators, systematically defrauded the complainant's family by taking advance payments and installments for flat bookings without delivering possession or refunding money. The court noted the serious nature of the charges, similar criminal history (46 prior cases), and that co-accused's bail was previously rejected, thereby dismissing the bail petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary The Additional Sessions Court, Mathura rejected the bail application of Vipin Singh Yadav in a fraud case (Crime No. 168/2018) involving charges under IPC sections 420, 406, 409, 467, 468, and 471. The court found prima facie evidence that the accused, along with co-conspirators, systematically defrauded the complainant's family by taking advance payments and installments for flat bookings without delivering possession or refunding money. The court noted the serious nature of the charges, similar criminal history (46 prior cases), and that co-accused's bail was previously rejected, thereby dismissing the bail petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts