State Government vs Vipin Singh Yadav — 778/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 420,409,406,467,468,471. Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPMT010016442026

Filing Number

1466/2026

Filing Date

20-Feb-2026

Registration No

778/2026

Registration Date

20-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Judge, Mathura

Judge

4-Addl. District Judge Court No. 3

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Rejected

Last updated 06-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

162

Police Station

FARAH

Year

2017

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 420,409,406,467,468,471

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Government

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Vipin Singh Yadav

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Court, Mathura dismissed the bail application of Vipin Singh Yadav, accused in a real estate fraud case (Crime No. 162/2017) involving charges under IPC sections 420, 467, 468, and 471. The court found prima facie evidence that the accused, along with co-conspirators, systematically defrauded multiple persons by promising flat bookings in a non-existent "Culprit Estate" project while collecting substantial deposits, and noted the accused's criminal history including 46 similar cases registered against him. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. District Judge Court No. 3

  4. 27-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Addl. District Judge Court No. 3

  5. 20-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 20-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 778/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Court, Mathura dismissed the bail application of Vipin Singh Yadav, accused in a real estate fraud case (Crime No. 162/2017) involving charges under IPC sections 420, 467, 468, and 471. The court found prima facie evidence that the accused, along with co-conspirators, systematically defrauded multiple persons by promising flat bookings in a non-existent "Culprit Estate" project while collecting substantial deposits, and noted the accused's criminal history including 46 similar cases registered against him. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case