State Government vs Vipin Singh Yadav — 775/2026
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 420,409,406,467,468,471. Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 10th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: UPMT010016432026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1465/2026
Filing Date
20-02-2026
Registration No
775/2026
Registration Date
20-02-2026
Court
District and Session Judge, Mathura
Judge
4-Addl. District Judge Court No. 3
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Rejected
FIR Details
FIR Number
292
Police Station
FARAH
Year
2018
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Government
Respondent(s)
Vipin Singh Yadav
Hearing History
Judge: 4-Addl. District Judge Court No. 3
Disposed
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 27-02-2026 | Hearing | |
| 20-02-2026 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Additional Sessions Court in Mathura rejected the bail application of Vipin Singh Yadav (Bail Petition No. 775/2026) in a criminal case involving charges under IPC Sections 420, 406, 409, 467, 468, and 471. The court found substantial evidence that the accused, along with co-conspirators, fraudulently induced the complainant to invest ₹4,60,000 for a flat that was never delivered, nor was the money refunded, and noted the accused's involvement in 46 similar criminal cases. The bail petition was dismissed, holding that no sufficient grounds existed to grant bail given the serious nature of the offenses and evidence against the applicant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Additional Sessions Court in Mathura rejected the bail application of Vipin Singh Yadav (Bail Petition No. 775/2026) in a criminal case involving charges under IPC Sections 420, 406, 409, 467, 468, and 471. The court found substantial evidence that the accused, along with co-conspirators, fraudulently induced the complainant to invest ₹4,60,000 for a flat that was never delivered, nor was the money refunded, and noted the accused's involvement in 46 similar criminal cases. The bail petition was dismissed, holding that no sufficient grounds existed to grant bail given the serious nature of the offenses and evidence against the applicant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts