State Government vs Vipin Singh Yadav — 775/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 420,409,406,467,468,471. Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPMT010016432026

Filing Number

1465/2026

Filing Date

20-Feb-2026

Registration No

775/2026

Registration Date

20-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Judge, Mathura

Judge

4-Addl. District Judge Court No. 3

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Rejected

Last updated 06-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

292

Police Station

FARAH

Year

2018

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 420,409,406,467,468,471

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Government

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Vipin Singh Yadav

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Summary The Additional Sessions Court in Mathura rejected the bail application of Vipin Singh Yadav (Bail Petition No. 775/2026) in a criminal case involving charges under IPC Sections 420, 406, 409, 467, 468, and 471. The court found substantial evidence that the accused, along with co-conspirators, fraudulently induced the complainant to invest ₹4,60,000 for a flat that was never delivered, nor was the money refunded, and noted the accused's involvement in 46 similar criminal cases. The bail petition was dismissed, holding that no sufficient grounds existed to grant bail given the serious nature of the offenses and evidence against the applicant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. District Judge Court No. 3

  4. 27-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Addl. District Judge Court No. 3

  5. 20-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 20-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 775/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Additional Sessions Court in Mathura rejected the bail application of Vipin Singh Yadav (Bail Petition No. 775/2026) in a criminal case involving charges under IPC Sections 420, 406, 409, 467, 468, and 471. The court found substantial evidence that the accused, along with co-conspirators, fraudulently induced the complainant to invest ₹4,60,000 for a flat that was never delivered, nor was the money refunded, and noted the accused's involvement in 46 similar criminal cases. The bail petition was dismissed, holding that no sufficient grounds existed to grant bail given the serious nature of the offenses and evidence against the applicant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case