Tarif vs State Government — 817/2026
Case under Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti-social Activities (prevention) Act, 1986 Section 2,3. Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 16th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: UPMT010016142026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1437/2026
Filing Date
19-02-2026
Registration No
817/2026
Registration Date
24-02-2026
Court
District and Session Judge, Mathura
Judge
6-Addl. District Judge Court No. 5
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Rejected
FIR Details
FIR Number
73
Police Station
VRINDAVAN
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Tarif
Respondent(s)
State Government
Hearing History
Judge: 6-Addl. District Judge Court No. 5
Disposed
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | Hearing | |
| 26-02-2026 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The Special Judge (Gangster Act) in Mathura rejected the anticipatory bail application of Tarif (accused of vehicle theft under the UP Gangster Act, 2020). The court found sufficient grounds to deny bail, as the accused faced charges of stealing vehicles in conspiracy with co-accused gang members and the allegations appeared credible. The court held that inadequate prima facie evidence existed to grant anticipatory bail, thereby dismissing the application dated March 16, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Special Judge (Gangster Act) in Mathura rejected the anticipatory bail application of Tarif (accused of vehicle theft under the UP Gangster Act, 2020). The court found sufficient grounds to deny bail, as the accused faced charges of stealing vehicles in conspiracy with co-accused gang members and the allegations appeared credible. The court held that inadequate prima facie evidence existed to grant anticipatory bail, thereby dismissing the application dated March 16, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts