State Government vs vipin singh yadav — 761/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 420,409,406,467,468,471. Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPMT010016132026

Filing Number

1436/2026

Filing Date

19-Feb-2026

Registration No

761/2026

Registration Date

19-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Judge, Mathura

Judge

4-Addl. District Judge Court No. 3

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Rejected

Last updated 17-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

174

Police Station

FARAH

Year

2017

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 420,409,406,467,468,471

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Government

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.vipin singh yadav

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Case Summary The Additional Sessions Court, Mathura, rejected the bail petition of accused Vippin Singh Yadav (Case No. 174/2017) charged under IPC sections 420, 467, 468, and 471 for alleged fraud involving insurance policies. The court found sufficient evidence against the accused, noted the serious nature of charges carrying life imprisonment, and observed a history of 46 similar criminal cases, making bail inappropriate without examining merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. District Judge Court No. 3

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Addl. District Judge Court No. 3

  5. 26-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Addl. District Judge Court No. 3

  6. 19-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 19-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 761/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Additional Sessions Court, Mathura, rejected the bail petition of accused Vippin Singh Yadav (Case No. 174/2017) charged under IPC sections 420, 467, 468, and 471 for alleged fraud involving insurance policies. The court found sufficient evidence against the accused, noted the serious nature of charges carrying life imprisonment, and observed a history of 46 similar criminal cases, making bail inappropriate without examining merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case